Problematic Internet Usage Among Prospective Teachers

PROBLEMATIC INTERNET USAGE AMONG PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS*

Aylin TUTGUN
Lecturer (M.A), Education Faculty, Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies
Maltepe University, Istanbul, Turkey
aylintutgun@maltepe.edu.tr

Levent DENİZ
Asst. Prof., Ataturk Education Faculty, Department of Educational Science
Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
ldeniz@marmara.edu.tr


ABSTRACT

In this research, problematic internet usage of prospective teachers has been analyzed according to a wide range of features such as gender, department, daily internet usage etc.  The research has been conducted among 686 prospective teachers studying at Marmara University and Boğaziçi (Bosphorus) University. In data gathering, problematic internet usage scale has been employed. Here are the basic results of this research: (a) Prospective teachers have medium level of problematic internet usage; (b) Male prospective teachers are, compared to female prospective teachers, more oriented towards problematic internet usage; (c) Prospective teachers who have longer periods of daily internet usage are more oriented to problematic internet usage; (d) Prospective teachers who feel themselves more competent than the ones who feel less competent in computer usage are more oriented to problematic internet use. When these results are evaluated as a whole, the fact that prospective teachers are, though in medium level, oriented to problematic internet usage may be an indicator of potential negative consequences they are likely to face in future. Based on these obtained results, it is considered that in Education Faculties where teachers are trained this matter should be paid attention and necessary measurements should be taken.
Key words: Problematic internet usage, Internet addiction, Prospective teachers
INTRODUCTION

Computer and internet usage, as the outcome of rapid development in technology, has been one of the basic necessities of life. Parallel to the whole world in Turkey as well thanks to the developing technology, internet usage has become prevalent for different purposes in every step of life. Since internet enables learning outside class borders and lesson hours, it is also commonly practiced as a teaching aid. According to Deniz and Coşkun (2004), as a teaching aid, internet provides low-cost, global, interactive and compact computer communication and gives a chance to the student to improve his/her learning experience. On the other hand, since internet is becoming rapidly widespread, the ratio of its accessibility from home, work, school internet houses etc. is also getting bigger. The conducted researches (Ceyhan, Ceyhan and Gürcan, 2007; Deniz, 2001, 2007; Deniz and Coşkun, 2004) also indicate that a majority of students have easy access to computer and internet facilities.
Although in the developing world, increasing the communication and facilitating data share for the purpose of multiplying researchers’ resources are amongst the main functions of the internet, unexpectedly rapid pervasion of internet brings with itself several problems as well. It has been observed that while some people limit their internet usage to an actually needed length, others fail to establish this control thus they go through several problems in their work/school and social lives due to this excessive usage. We also come across some studies illustrating that these problems can even reach to clinical levels (Chin-Chung and Sunny, 2003; Davis, 2001; Köroğlu, Öztürk et al., 2006; Niemz, Griffiths and Banyard, 2005; Young and Rodgers, 1998; Young, 1996a, 1996b). Many researches have been conducted concerning the lack of required control on internet usage and the problems it creates. In these studies, several new concepts have also been presented. Goldberg (1999) is the name who first used the term “internet addiction” and opened it to discussion and by making use of alcohol addiction diagnosis scale in DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), he developed indicators specific to internet addiction (American Psychiatric Association, 1995). On the other hand Young (1996b), in line with “Pathological gambling” diagnosis standards in DSM-IV, has developed some criteria for internet addiction and negative internet usage. Following the cases reported by clinicians, discussions such as whether internet itself caused addiction or excessive internet usage uncovered already existing psychological problems in a behaviorist manner (Keser Özcan and Buzlu, 2005; King and Barak, 1999) emerged. Since behavior pattern causing trouble for individuals has been defined as “pathological” or “problematic” due to its destructive nature, for excessive internet usage too, different definitions have been presented. In the conducted studies, it is possible to come across several concepts such as internet addiction, internet dependency, problematic internet usage, pathological internet usage, internet behavior addiction and cyber addiction. Healthy internet usage however is explained as use of internet in an appropriate time to reach a desired objective without going through any mental or behavioral discomfort (Davis, 2001). According to Caplan (2005), problematic internet usage is a multi-dimensional syndrome composed of cognitive and behavioral signs and bearing negative social and academic/professional results. Young (1996b) however, preferred to employ internet addiction term and drew a parallel between internet addiction and drug/alcohol addiction since they all caused academic, social and professional losses. Kandell (1998) explained internet addiction as a psychological addiction and viewed particularly the young as a risky group and he emphasized that excessive usage of internet may cause problems related to health, communication and time management. In DSM-IV as well, similar to the pathological use/misuse of any drug or stimulant, although there is no present “(addiction)”, problematic internet usage has been attempted to illustrate by using two headlines. The first one is drug usage related disorders and the other one is “pathological gambling” which takes place amongst compulsion control disorders that have not been classified elsewhere. In this particular study however “problematic internet usage” term has been preferred.
While defining internet addiction, pathological or problematic internet usage, many researchers regarded the length people spend on internet as a vital criterion (Young and Rogers, 1998; Young, 1996a, 1996b). However it has also been underlined that only the time spent on internet is not adequate enough to give a definition of problematic internet usage, and that compulsive internet usage caused by excessive usage should also be considered a significant criterion (Caplan, 2005; Davis, 2001; Young and Rogers, 1998). Compulsive internet usage expresses people’s lack of control over internet usage and failure to sustain this control brings about serious problems in a person’s life. According to Caplan (2005) who regarded problematic internet usage a multi-dimensional syndrome, these individuals prefer to exhibit their face-to-face communication skills on internet environment and on internet they show a tendency for self-demonstration by establishing social interaction. It has been deduced that social isolation and loneliness people undergo force them to favor social interaction on internet (Kraut, Kiesler et al. 2002). As stated by Young (1996a), problematic internet users who share little time with real life people prefer to spend their times alone before computer.
Parallel to problematic internet usage, also a rapid transformation is viewed in the demographical structures of users. Particularly amongst university students, internet is pervasively benefited for a variety of purposes. Easy and fast internet access at universities, connections with assignments and lecturers, lesson follow-ups, research needs etc. enable even non-internet user university students to turn into internet users. On the other hand, due to various factors comprising developmental problems, university students are more inclined to develop problems related to excessive internet usage (Ceyhan, Ceyhan and Gürcan, 2007). Tendencies of university students to establish intimate relations with the opposite sex make internet usage attractive for them. Furthermore psychological and environmental factors surrounding university students may drive them to undergo internet addiction. It is inevitable that university students with low social skills end up being isolated from their environment. Internet in a way functions as a platform for such students to prove themselves. According to Erikson (1998) the basic developmental mission of university youngsters is achieving to establish close contact with the members of the same or opposite sex. It is true that university youth failing to develop social skills in natural social environment is likely to face potential problems in future, particularly in their family and work environments. The social and academic failures individual an individual undergo due to the problematic internet usage at university years may bring about negativities that can form the base for loneliness/social isolation and potential family and work problems in future years. In professions such as teaching which indeed necessitates social interaction skills, it is inevitable that the individual is likely to face certain problems. Undoubtedly any teacher who suffers from professional and social problems due to excessive internet usage cannot set a good role model and fail to provide a healthy learning environment for students. That is why in training faculties where teachers are educated, problematic internet usage of prospective teachers calls for detailed analysis. Thus, potential problems can be detected and in-depth researches to prevent their emergence can be conducted.
The Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this study is to analyze problematic internet usage of prospective teachers. In line with this objective, differential models of problematic internet usage of prospective teachers are attempted to detect according to below-stated research questions:
1.      What is the level of problematic internet usage of prospective teachers?
2.      Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to gender?
3.      Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their presence in the 1st (freshman student) or 4th (senior student) class?
4.      Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their departments?
5.      Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their universities?
6.      Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to the time they first started using internet?
7.      Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their daily internet usage lengths?
8.      Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their computer usage self- competency perceptions?
METHODOLOGY
Research Model

In this research titled “Analysis of Problematic Internet Usage of Prospective Teachers” the attempt has been to detect whether or not problematic internet usage varies according to certain demographical variables. Parallel to that aim, the research has been conducted on the basis of general survey method.
Participants
The sampling of present research consists of 686 prospective teachers studying at Marmara University and Boğaziçi University Education Faculties. The sample contains 1st and (n=365) and 4th class (n=321) prospective teachers who were selected according to simple random selection technique. Of all the participants 59,6% (n=409) is female, 40,4% (n=277) is male. The distribution of prospective teachers having participated in this research with respect to their university, department and class is given in Table 1.
Table 1
The Distribution of Prospective Teachers Having Participated in this Research with respect to their University, Department and Class
Departments
Branches
Marmara University
Boğaziçi University
TOTAL
n
%
n
%
n
%
CET*
CET
64
13,8
40
17,8
104
15,1
Science & Mathematics
Primary Mathematics Education
61
13,2
22
9,8
177
25,8
Secondary Mathematics Education
50
10,8
21
9,3
Science Education
-
-
23
10,2
Social Fields
Guidance and Psychological Counseling
94
20,3
49
21,8
365
53,2
English Language Education
79
17,0
40
17,8
Turkish Education
74
16,0
-
-
Pre-school Education
-
-
29
12,9
Fine Arts
Art Education
40
8,6
-
-
40
5,8
Total
462
100
224
100
686
100

*Computer Education and Educational Technology (CET)

Measurements

The data of research have been obtained by employing Personal Information Form and Problematic Internet Usage scale. 
Personal Information Form

Personal Information Form has been prepared by the researcher for the purpose of discovering certain demographical features of prospective teachers. In this part, the data gathered from users are; the registered university, department, class, gender, the degree they feel self-competent on computer applications, the time they first started using the internet, daily internet usage length. 
Problematic Internet Usage Scale

Problematic Internet Usage Scale is a measurement tool aiming to detect problematic internet usage of university students and has been developed by Ceyhan, Ceyhan and Gürcan (2007). This scale consists of 3 sub-scales namely “negative consequences of internet”, “social benefit/social comfort” and “excessive usage”. In reliability analyses of scale, for the total of scale cronbach α internal consistency coefficient has been found as 0.95; for the negative consequences of internet as 0.94, for social benefit/social comfort as 0.85 and for excessive usage as 0.75. In present research however, cronbach α internal consistency coefficient has been detected as 0.93 for the total of scale; as 0.91 for the negative consequences of internet, 0.85 for social benefit/social comfort and 0.77 for excessive usage.
Problematic Internet Usage Scale is a 5 point Likert scale consisting of total 33 items. Those items are graded between “Totally appropriate” (5 scores) and “Not appropriate at all” (1 point). Receiving high scores from scale is considered as a sign that internet usage of individuals is becoming unhealthy, internet has affected their lives negatively and possible to give way to a pathological inclination such as dependency.
FINDINGS
First of all in this research the level of problematic internet usage of teachers has been examined. Arithmetic means and standard deviations derived from problematic internet usage scale and sub-scales are given in Table 2. As distributions of these scores are analyzed, it reveals that problematic internet usage of prospective teachers is in medium level.
Table 2
Distributions of Scores Derived from Problematic Internet Usage Scale and Sub Scales by Prospective Teachers
PIU Scale and Sub-scales
n
sd
Negative consequences of the Internet
686
27.01
11.35
Social benefit/social comfort
686
17.94
6.76
Excessive usage
686
17.25
5.71
Problematic internet usage
686
62.21
20.22

An answer to the question “Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to gender?” has been searched. Independent Samples “t” test has been applied on the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale and sub-scales and the results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Comparison Results of Gender Differentiation in Problematic Internet Usage of Prospective Teachers
PIU Scale and Sub-scales
Gender
n
sd
df
t
p
Negative consequences of the Internet
Female
409
25.07
9.81
684
5,55
,000
Male
277
29.88
12.81
Social benefit/social comfort
Female
409
16.47
6.02
684
7,12
,000
Male
277
20.10
7.21
Excessive usage
Female
409
17.10
5.36
684
,95
,341
Male
277
17.48
4.98
Problematic internet usage
Female
409
58.65
18.46
684
5,72
,000
Male
277
67.46
21.56

Table 3 reveals that compared to women, men obtained significantly higher scores (p<0,01) from problematic internet usage scale, sub-scales of negative consequences of internet and social benefit/social comfort. Once the scores obtained from excessive usage sub-scale are analyzed, no meaningful difference is detected between groups. As a result, it can be asserted that on gender dimension, male prospective teachers are more inclined to problematic internet usage.
An answer to the question “Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their presence in the 1st or 4th class?” has been looked for. Independent Samples “t” test has been applied on the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale and sub-scales and the results are shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Comparison Results of Class Differentiation with respect to the Presence in the 1st or 4th class in Problematic Internet Usage of Prospective Teachers
PIU Scale and Sub-scales
Class
n
sd
df
t
p
Negative consequences of the Internet
1st class
365
27.46
11.32
684
1,10
,271
4th class
321
26.50
11.39
Social benefit/social comfort
1st class
365
18.44
7.01
684
2,08
,038
4th class
321
17.36
6.42
Excessive usage
1st class
365
17.76
5.61
684
2,71
,007
4th class
321
16.68
4.66
Problematic internet usage
1st class
365
63.67
20.93
684
2,01
,044
4th class
321
60.55
19.28
Table 4 reveals that prospective teachers in the 1st class has obtained significantly higher scores (p<0,05) than 4th class prospective teachers from problematic internet usage scale, social benefit/social comfort and excessive usage sub-scales. However no differentiation between classes has been found in the scores obtained from negative consequences of internet sub-scale. To conclude, it is possible to claim that 1st class prospective teachers are more oriented to problematic internet usage than 4th class prospective teachers.
An answer to the question “Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their departments?” has been sought out. One-Way Analysis of Variance has been applied to the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale and sub-scales and the results are given in Table 5.
Table 5
One-Way Analysis of Variance Results of the Differences in terms of Problematic Internet Usage of Prospective Teachers with respect to their Department
PIU Scale & Sub-scales
Departments
n
sd
F
Difference
Negative consequences of the Internet
A. CET
104
29.78
11.27
2.70*
A>C; A>D
B. Science &Mathematics
177
27.07
11.73
C. Social Fields
365
26.35
11.19
D. Fine Arts
40
25.60
10.63
TOTAL
685
27.01
11.35
Social benefit/social comfort
A. CET
104
20.08
6.32
5.38*
A>B; A>C; A>D
B. Science &Mathematics
177
17.26
6.74
C. Social Fields
365
18.33
6.87
D. Fine Arts
40
16.80
6.53
TOTAL
685
17.94
6.76
Excessive usage
A. CET
104
18.63
4.71
3.19*
A>B; A>C; A>D
B. Science &Mathematics
177
16.95
5.44
C. Social Fields
365
17.25
5.04
D. Fine Arts
40
16.42
4.57
TOTAL
685
17.25
5.21
Problematic internet usage
A. CET
104
68.50
18.70
4.639*
A>B; A>C; A>D
B. Science &Mathematics
177
60.56
20.51
C. Social Fields
365
62.67
20.22
D. Fine Arts
40
58.82
18.61
TOTAL
685
62.21
20.22

Table 5 reveals that the scores obtained from the whole scale and negative consequences of internet, social benefit/social comfort and excessive usage sub- scales differ with respect to departments. The LSD analysis reveals that prospective teachers in Computer Education and Educational Technology (CET) department received significantly higher scores (p<0,05) than the participants in other departments.
These results put forward that prospective teachers in CET department are more oriented towards problematic internet usage. Once the remaining departments are compared within themselves, no meaningful differentiation has been obtained. 
An answer to the question “Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their universities?” has been searched. Independent Samples “t” test has been applied on the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale and sub-scales and the results are shown in Table 6.
Table 6
Comparison Results of the Differences in terms of Problematic Internet Usage of Prospective Teachers with respect to their University
PIU Scale & Sub-scales
University
n
sd
df
t
p
Negative consequences of the Internet
Marmara
462
26.53
11.54
684
1,60
,108
Boğaziçi
224
28.01
10.93
Social benefit/social comfort
Marmara
462
17.99
6.79
684
,29
,767
Boğaziçi
224
17.83
6.71
Excessive usage
Marmara
462
16.87
5.10
684
2,76
,006
Boğaziçi
224
18.04
5.37
Problematic internet usage
Marmara
462
61.40
20.40
684
1,51
,130
Boğaziçi
224
63.89
19.79

Table 6 reveals that the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale, sub-scales of negative consequences of internet and social benefit/social comfort did not vary according to universities. In excessive usage sub-scale on the other hand prospective teachers attending Boğaziçi University had significantly higher score averages (p<0,05) than prospective teachers at Marmara University. The comparison revealed that prospective teachers attending Boğaziçi University are more oriented to excessive internet usage.
An answer to the question “Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to the time they first started using internet?” has been searched for. One-Way Analysis of Variance has been applied to the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale and sub-scales and the results are given in Table 7.
Table 7
One-Way Analysis of Variance Results of the Differences in terms of Problematic Internet Usage of Prospective Teachers with respect to the time they first Started Using Internet
PIU Scale & Sub-scales
Internet Usage Period
n
sd
F
Difference
Negative consequences of the Internet
A. Less than 1 year
21
22.14
5.47
4.65*
D>A; D>B; D>C
B. 1-3 years
135
26.05
10.29
C. 4-5 years
251
25.97
10.94
D. More than 5 years
279
28.78
12.27
TOTAL
686
27.01
11.35
Social benefit/social comfort
A. Less than 1 year
21
16.14
5.25
1.14

B. 1-3 years
135
17.33
6.26
C. 4-5 years
251
18.00
6.99
D. More than 5 years
279
18.30
6.87
TOTAL
686
17.94
6.76
Excessive usage
A. Less than 1 year
21
15.23
5.51
3.25*
D>A; D>B
B. 1-3 years
135
16.57
5.24
C. 4-5 years
251
17.09
5.15
D. More than 5 years
279
17.88
5.16
TOTAL
686
17.25
5.21
Problematic internet usage
A. Less than 1 year
21
53.52
14.33
3.89*
D>A; D>B; D>C
B. 1-3 years
135
59.96
19.12
C. 4-5 years
251
61.07
20.04
D. More than 5 years
279
64.97
20.95
TOTAL
686
62.21
20.22

Table 7 reveals that the scores derived from the whole scale and negative consequences of internet and excessive usage sub-scales significantly differed (p<0,05) according to the total length from the time they first started using internet till present day. At the end of LSD analysis it has been detected that according to negative consequences of internet and excessive internet usage sub-scales and problematic internet usage scale results, prospective teachers who have been using internet for more than 5 years are more inclined to problematic internet usage than the ones who have been using it for a shorter length of time. In social benefit /social comfort sub-scale however no differentiation according to total length of internet usage has been attained.
An answer to the question “Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their daily internet usage lengths?” has been looked for. One-Way Analysis of Variance has been applied to the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale and sub scales and the results are given in Table 8.
Table 8
One-Way Analysis of Variance Results of the Differences in terms of Problematic Internet Usage of  Prospective Teachers with respect to their Daily Internet Usage Lengths
PIU Scale & Sub-scales
Daily Internet Usage
n
sd
F
Difference
Negative consequences of the Internet
A. Less than 1 hour
196
23.69
9.54
19.36*
D>A; D>B; D>C
B. 1-4 hours
396
27.15
10.93
C. 5-8 hours
81
32.02
12.55
D. More than 8 hours
13
41.53
17.84
TOTAL
686
27.01
11.35
Social benefit/social comfort
A. Less than 1 hour
196
16.63
6.02
8.23*
D>A; D>B
B. 1-4 hours
396
17.94
6.70
C. 5-8 hours
81
20.24
7.06
D. More than 8 hours
13
23.00
10.93
TOTAL
686
17.94
6.76
Excessive usage
A. Less than 1 hour
196
14.56
4.57
40.20*
D>A; D>B
B. 1-4 hours
396
17.72
4.90
C. 5-8 hours
81
20.64
4.74
D. More than 8 hours
13
22.53
6.05
TOTAL
686
17.25
5.21
Problematic internet usage
A. Less than 1 hour
196
54.89
17.30
25.18*
D>A; D>B; D>C
B. 1-4 hours
396
62.83
19.30
C. 5-8 hours
81
72.91
21.12
D. More than 8 hours
13
87.07
30.33
TOTAL
686
62.21
20.22

Table 8 reveals that the scores derived from the whole scale and negative consequences of internet and social benefit/social comfort and excessive usage sub-scales differ with respect to daily internet usage lengths. At the end of LSD analysis it has been detected that according to sub-scales of negative consequences of internet and excessive internet usage and problematic internet usage scale results, the group who spent more than 8 hours on internet created a significantly meaningful difference (p<0,01) compared to other groups. When the remaining groups are compared within each other, it has been viewed that the group spending 5-8 hours a day on internet differed from other groups. To conclude, it can be stated that prospective teachers with longer periods of daily internet usage are more inclined towards problematic internet usage.
An answer to the question “Does problematic internet usage of prospective teachers vary according to their computer usage self-competency perceptions?” has been searched. One-Way Analysis of Variance has been applied to the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale and sub scales and the results are given in Table 9.
Table 9
One-Way Analysis of Variance Results of the Differences in terms of Problematic Internet Usage of  Prospective Teachers with respect to their Computer Usage Self-Competency Perceptions
PIU Scale & Sub-scales
Computer Usage Self-Competency
n
sd
F
Difference
Negative consequences of the Internet
A. Less competent
174
24.88
10.24
7.36*
C>A; C>B; B>A
B. Competent
434
27.22
11.04
C. High competent
77
30.72
14.30
TOTAL
685
27.02
11.36

Social benefit/social comfort
A. Less competent
174
17.08
6.65
3.77*
C>A; C>B
B. Competent
434
17.96
6.59
C. High competent
77
19.61
7.62
TOTAL
685
17.92
6.75
Excessive usage
A. Less competent
174
15.78
5.38
11.49*
C>A; B>A
B. Competent
434
17.57
5.06
C. High competent
77
18.81
5.00
TOTAL
685
17.26
5.21
Problematic internet usage
A. Less competent
174
57.75
19.26
9.11*
C>A; C>B; B>A
B. Competent
434
62.76
19.55
C. High competent
77
69.15
23.83
TOTAL
685
62.20
20.24

Table 8 reveals that the scores derived from the whole scale and sub- scale of negative consequences of internet and sub-scales of social benefit/social comfort and excessive usage differ with respect to their computer usage self-competency perceptions. At the end of LSD analysis, it has been detected that prospective teachers who felt thoroughly competent in computer environment created a significantly meaningful difference (p<0,01) compared to the ones who felt less competent. As a result, it can be deduced that prospective teachers who felt thoroughly competent in computer environment are more oriented towards problematic internet usage than the ones who felt less competent.
 CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION
In present research, first of all, problematic internet usage level of prospective teachers has been detected in line with the scores obtained from problematic internet usage scale and sub-scales and found as medium.  
According to the research results related to gender differentiation in terms of problematic internet usage of prospective teachers: Once the average scores derived from sub-scale of negative consequences of internet, with respect to gender, it has been detected that compared to female prospective teachers, male prospective teachers are more exposed (p<0,01) to negative consequences of internet. This finding supports other researches which put forward that as internet addiction is evaluated with respect to gender, men are more inclined to pathological internet usage than women (Anderson, 2001; Kubey, Lavin and Barrows, 2001; Morahan-Martin and Schumacher, 2000).
As the scores derived from social benefit/social comfort sub-scale aiming to measure problematic usage of internet for the purpose of social benefit/social comfort are analyzed, with respect to gender, once again a statistically significant difference (p<0,01) has been detected between men and women. Accordingly, compared to female prospective teachers male prospective teachers spend time on the internet mostly for social purposes and feel more comfortable on the internet. This deduction supports other researches (Caplan, 2005; Davis, 2001; Young, 1996b) which assert that excessive usage of internet to obtain social benefit can bring about certain negative consequences. As stated by Caplan (2005), individuals who lack skills to show themselves prefer online communication instead of face-to-face interaction and consequently online social interaction drives these individuals to compulsive internet usage which brings with itself some negative consequences. This in turn pushes people to face negativities in many fields due to their internet usage. Based on this point, Davis (2001) calls attention to the fact that people are harmed due to the negativities they go through in their work, school and personal relations and he advocates that problematic internet usage contains in itself compulsive internet usage. As exhibited in present research as well, for the purpose of getting social benefit/social comfort, prospective teachers perform problematic internet usage tendencies thus they get exposed to negative consequences of internet and with respect to gender, male prospective teachers are more oriented towards problematic internet usage than female prospective teachers.
According to the data derived from excessive usage sub-scale aiming to detect over-use of internet, there is no meaningful difference between male prospective teachers and female prospective teachers. Although internet can be used excessively for a multitude of purposes (Young and Rodgers, 1998; Young, 1996a, 1996b) excessiveness on internet usage length alone can not be interpreted as a problematic internet usage (Caplan, 2005; Davis, 2001; Griffiths, 2000a, b; Young and Rogers, 1998).
As total scores received from problematic internet usage scale are compared, it has been observed that scores vary with respect to gender and compared to female prospective teachers, male prospective teachers are more oriented towards problematic internet usage. Based on this conclusion, although there is not a difference between male and female prospective teachers in terms of excessive usage we can still claim that female prospective teachers are less directed to problematic internet usage than male prospective teachers. A similar result has been obtained from Morahan-Martin and Schumacher (2000)’s research as well. Here the majority of patients diagnosed with pathological internet user are composed of men who use internet to meet new people, receive emotional support, play interactive games and attain social comfort. This deduction as well is totally concordant with the results obtained from our research.
Besides, some comparisons have been made whether or not first or fourth class attendance of prospective teachers caused a divergence in their tendencies towards problematic internet usage, and the attempt has been to detect if any change occurred in terms of problematic internet usage within the process students first started their university education and the process they get closer to graduation.
Firstly average scores derived from negative consequences of internet sub-scale have been compared and it has been viewed that prospective teachers’ attendance in the 1st or 4th year created no difference. As average scores were examined, it reveals that prospective teachers attending the 1st class had higher average scores.
On the other hand, a meaningful difference has emerged between social benefit /social comfort, excessive usage sub-scales and the whole problematic internet usage scale. Prospective teachers in the 1st class obtained significantly higher scores (p<0,05)  from social benefit/social comfort sub-scale than 4th class prospective teachers. Compared to 4th class prospective teachers, first class prospective teachers use internet more commonly for social purposes and they feel themselves more comfortable on internet. Accordingly we can assert that freshman prospective teachers prefer internet environment to form a social ambiance and since they feel themselves more comfortable here they use internet to make friends more freely and easily. As stated by Erikson (1998), “the basic developmental mission of university youngsters is achieving to establish close contact with the members of the same or opposite sex”. Freshman students as well make use of internet to form a social ambiance and when they reach 4th class we assume their attempts diminish. Furthermore, since universities shelter students from different cities or countries students may have a tendency to prefer internet not only to establish a social ambiance but also to contact with their family and friends in far away places. Leon and Rotunda (2000) in their research analyzed a 25-year old male international exchange student and discovered that due to few numbers of friends and cultural differences, this sample student spent the whole day on internet and parallel to that he over-used internet to meet new people and get informed about his family and friends and even more he stated that he had felt uneasy when no news arrived and his homesickness and depression settled once he communicated through internet. We can state that problematic usage caused by excessive internet usage is more impressible for students from distant places than other students.
According to the scores derived from sub-scale of excessive internet usage, there is a meaningful difference (p<0,05) between average scores of 1st class prospective teachers and 4th class prospective teachers. Based on this conclusion, we can assert that compared to fourth class prospective teachers, first year prospective teachers in education faculties are more inclined to excessive internet usage.
According to total point derived from problematic internet usage scale, compared to 4th class students, 1st class students are more oriented towards problematic internet usage (p<0,05). In a study conducted by Kubey, Lavin and Barrows (2001) amongst 576 students from Rutgers University, first year students filled 37,7 % of the group defined as dependent. To conclude, it is evident that 1st year prospective teachers are more directed towards pathological internet usage that may emerge in future. On the other hand, as an outcome of rapid developments in technology, young generation get acquainted with computer and internet at an earlier age thus compared to elders, they are likely to have more internet usage tendency. Wright (2001) underlines this fact by defining new generation as “Net Generation”. Once the reasons accounting for prevalent usage of internet by such young people are searched, the fact that internet access means become increasingly prevalent every new year (Turkish Statistical Institute, 2008) stands before us.
It has been found out that the scores obtained by prospective teachers from problematic internet usage scale and sub-scales differed (p<0,05) with respect to their departments. When all the results are evaluated as a whole, it has been seen that compared to other departments (Science and Mathematics, Social Fields, Fine Arts)  prospective teachers educated in CET (Computer Education and Educational Technology) department are more oriented towards problematic internet usage. Many researches point to the danger of problematic internet usage particularly for student population. The causes for this danger can be given such: easy access to internet, its vitality as a course in their programs, its easy usage even by people without interest for technology or in other words its easy usage for everyone. Accordingly if comparisons are made according to the departments prospective teachers attend, the prevalence of problematic internet usage within groups shall be detected thus necessary precautions may be taken more immediately.
Another comparison has been conducted between universities (Boğaziçi University and Marmara University). Accordingly, in problematic internet usage scale, sub-scales of negative consequences of internet and social benefit/social comfort, no meaningful difference has been detected between prospective teachers attending Boğaziçi and Marmara Universities. The only meaningful difference (p<0,05) has been found in excessive usage sub-scale. According to excessive usage sub-scale, prospective teachers at Boğaziçi University are more inclined to excessive internet usage than prospective teachers at Marmara University.
To summarize, the comparison between universities revealed that in the whole scale and sub-scales of negative consequences of internet and social benefit/social comfort, no difference has been detected. We can put forward that the difference present in excessive usage sub-scale stems not from social objective-oriented or negative consequence oriented usage of internet but rather its use for lesson/research purposes. However, several factors such as densely or scarcely populated classrooms and in line with that, adequacy or inadequacy of universities’ internet access or unlimited/unchecked internet access at universities may also be influential in the differences amongst universities. In Young’s (2006) research where unlimited and unchecked internet access at universities is focused on, a set of risk factors likely to cause internet addiction on students is listed and preventive suggestions have been made. In this research as well, since there is a difference between universities in terms of problematic excessive internet usage, aforementioned risk factors should be handled and the situation should be interpreted accordingly.
At the end of statistical analysis related to the question based on the differentiation with respect to length dependency of problematic internet usage of prospective teachers, first of all, the scores derived from negative consequences of internet sub-scale have been compared. Accordingly we can assert that prospective teachers using internet longer than 5 years are more inclined to its negative consequences than the ones using it for a shorter period of time. In Odabaşıoğlu, Öztürk et al. (2007) case study, prior to internet’s harmful usage or addiction, a period of average 1,5 months varying between 6 months to 3 years has been found. As illustrated in this research, internet’s harmful usage is actualized within this process varying from 6 months to 3 years, individuals reporting several complaints are exposed to a multitude of negativities (academic failures, social problems and family troubles). In the same research again, within this average 1,5 years of internet usage period, the ratio of users considered under risk for internet addiction varies between 8.68% and 18,4%. According to this deduction, in our research, the tendency for negative consequences of internet of the prospective teachers with more than 5 years of internet usage indicates potential problems, particularly at work, prospective teachers can suffer from in future.
In social benefit/social comfort sub-scale no meaningful difference has been found with respect to overall internet usage length from the beginning. It is possible to claim that individuals’ problem oriented social benefit/social comfort aiming internet usage varies not according to overall internet usage length from the beginning but rather it depends on their daily internet usage length. It is observed that this deduction is supported with the findings in our research concerning daily internet usage lengths.
In excessive usage sub-scale a meaningful difference has been detected with respect to the length of time internet is used. Once the groups are analyzed, a meaningful differentiation has been viewed between prospective teachers engaged with internet more than 5 years and prospective teachers engaged with internet 1-3 years or less than 1 year. Based on this deduction we can assert that prospective teachers engaged with internet more than 5 years are more inclined towards excessive internet usage than prospective teachers engaged with internet for a shorter period of time.
According to the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale, prospective teachers with more than 5 years of internet experience are more oriented to problematic internet usage than other prospective teachers. As conducted clinical studies (Leon and Rotunda, 2000; Odabaşıoğlu, Öztürk et al., 2007; Young, 1996a) exhibit, since there exist psychological problems and various negativities due to excessive and unhealthy usage of internet and developing in an average 1,5 years of internet usage, it is inevitable that prospective teachers may undergo potential troubles in future.
For the purpose of analyzing differentiation within problematic internet usage of prospective teachers with respect to their daily internet usage, firstly, scores derived from negative consequences of internet sub-scale have been compared. Accordingly the highest average (=41,53) has been obtained by prospective teachers spending more than 8 hours a day on internet and the smallest average(=23,69)  has been received by the ones spending less than 1 hour on the net. In the end, it has been detected that there is a difference between the ones spending more than 8 hours a day on the internet and the ones spending less than 1 hour, 1-4 hours and 5-8 hours. As other groups are compared within themselves, a difference has been found between prospective teachers spending 5-8 hours a day on internet and the ones spending 1-4 hours a day or less than 1 hour. The comparison between prospective teachers spending 1-4 hours a day on internet and less than 1 hour also put forward that as daily internet usage length increased tendency towards negative consequences of internet was also elevated. Based on this deduction we can assert that as daily internet usage length increases, tendency towards negative conclusions of internet also heightens. This finding is parallel to other researches where negative conclusions arising from internet usage length and excessive usage of internet are studied (Anderson, 2001; Caplan, 2005; Davis, 2001; Rotunda, Kass et al., 2003; Young, 1999).
In comparisons related to social benefit/social comfort aspect, it reveals that as daily internet usage length increases the tendency towards problematic internet usage for social benefit/social comfort also grows. This finding can be explained with the fact that individuals who go through social defencelessness in real life and who lack competent social skills use internet excessively to establish a social environment. As stated by Caplan (2005) individuals who lack skills to show themselves prefer online communication instead of face-to-face interaction and consequently online social interaction drives these individuals to spend longer periods of time on internet. On the other hand the social environment established on internet may drive people to use internet continuously and this situation can go so far as to cause some psychological disorders. In Young (1996a)’s case study, an internet user at first spent a few hours in a week for chatting and within 3 weeks, it has been detected that the user spent an average of 50- 60 hours on internet since he claimed to feel a compulsion to enter internet. According to the research once the user gets away from social environment on internet he shows symptoms of withdrawal, s/he cancels appointment, gives up calling real life friends, puts an end to previously enjoyed social activities, lessens family contact, gives up daily chores and during the times when there is no internet access he said that he felt under depression, tense and nervous. In literature as well, there are many clinical researches supporting this deduction (Black, Belsare and Schlosser, 1999; Caplan, 2005; Griffiths, 2000b; Leon and Rotunda, 2000; Young, 1996a).
In comparisons concerning sub-scale of excessive usage, it has been determined that as daily internet usage length increases problem oriented excessive internet usage tendency also grows. In Griffiths’ (2000b) research, it has been underlined that excessive internet users do so in order to overcome or inactivate their insufficiencies (social defencelessness in real life, low self-esteem, physical incompetence). Accordingly these particular individuals go through serious problems due to excessive usage of internet. In short, as daily internet usage length increases, problematic internet usage tendency also grows.
As research results concerning the differentiation in problematic internet usage of prospective teachers with respect to their self-competency perceptions in computer usage it has been found out that prospective teachers who feel totally competent in computer usage are more oriented towards negative consequences of internet than prospective teachers who feel themselves little or satisfactorily competent in computer  usage. Based on the fact that the very same conclusion has been obtained in the comparison between prospective teachers who feel totally competent in computer usage and prospective teachers who feel less competent, we conclude that as computer usage self-competency perceptions of prospective teachers increase, there emerges an elevation in terms of orientation towards negative consequences of internet. Young and Rodgers (1998), in their research detected certain characteristics amongst internet addictive people, accordingly, in addition to excessive self-trust these people also had several features such as (emotional sensitivity, reactivation, alertness, inability to self-demonstration and maladjustment) which may bring about negativities. Similarly an individual feeling thoroughly competent in computer usage, since s/he will have a tendency towards above mentioned characteristics, is more likely to be oriented towards problematic internet usage while using internet excessively for social purposes. For an emotionally sensible, maladjusted person, one of the most favorable environments for self-demonstration is internet environment. In that case the aforementioned people are likely to make more use of internet environment where they can achieve social comfort and self demonstration thus internet is used more frequently each coming day. We can allege that self-trust of individuals who can demonstrate themselves more easily on computer environment also increases.
As social benefit/social comfort sub-scale results concerning the differentiation in problematic internet usage of prospective teachers with respect to their self-competency perceptions in computer usage are analyzed, a meaningful differentiation  (p<0,05)  has been found out. Compared to prospective teachers who feel themselves little or satisfactorily competent in computer usage, prospective teachers who feel totally competent in computer usage are more oriented towards problematic internet usage aiming social benefit/social comfort. Individuals who prefer applications that allow for social interaction on internet environment are likely to use internet excessively for such purposes. There are certain researches indicating that easily applicable, interactive internet programs that can be used even by the ones who lack any computer literacy can be so effective that they can even drive these people to addiction (Black, Belsare and Schlosser, 1999; Leon and Rotunda, 2000; Young, 1996a). In that case those people feel themselves competent on computer usage and since they feel adequate in such applications, compared to the ones feeling less competent, they are more likely to orient towards problematic internet usage.
As research results concerning the differentiation in excessive internet usage dimension are examined, it has been found out that prospective teachers who feel totally competent in computer usage perform a meaningful difference (p<0,01) than prospective teachers who feel themselves less competent in computer  usage. We can claim that prospective teachers who feel totally competent in computer usage are more oriented to excessive internet usage. Based on the fact that the very same result has been obtained from the scores derived from problematic internet usage scale, we conclude that as computer usage self-competency perceptions of prospective teachers increase, there emerges an elevation in terms of orientation towards problematic internet usage.
Internet addiction is a comprehensive term covering several behavioral disorders, compulsion-control syndromes. That means internet usage is likely to damage one’s mental health. As indicated by present research, problematic internet usage tendency of prospective teachers is clearly a warning for the potential negativities they can go through in future. As a conclusion it is urgent that in Education Faculties where prospective teachers are trained, immediate precautions be taken. Driven by this deduction, in this research several suggestions are stated.

SUGGESTIONS

In present research, by employing “negative consequences of internet”, “social benefit/social comfort” and “excessive usage” sub-scales in line with certain demographical features of prospective teachers, their tendencies towards problematic internet usage have been detected. Based on the research findings, various suggestions have been developed concerning problematic internet usage tendency of prospective teachers:
  1. The level of problematic internet usage of prospective teachers in Education Faculties of Universities should be detected by conducting regular researches and action should be taken for securing control. On the other hand, problematic internet usage of students from other faculties should also be analyzed.
  2. As problematic internet usage is analyzed with respect to gender, it reveals that male prospective teachers are more oriented to problematic internet usage than female prospective teachers. In accordance with this deduction, a comprehensive research for men can be initiated to analyze the origin of this problem. At universities, measurements to provide equal internet-access opportunities for male and female students should be taken. 
  3. It is necessary that certain precautions be taken to prevent freshman prospective teachers from excessively using internet to compensate for their insufficiency to adapt to the new social environments and establish new friendships. Within this context, lecturers can support prospective teachers, freshmen in particular, by assigning them with group projects to create social environment and cooperative study methods in class.
  4. In order to detect if at different universities, problematic internet usage of prospective teachers varies greater number of universities should be included into the study to widen the scope of research.  
  5. In order to prevent lack of control in internet usage of prospective teachers, lecturers should organize regular conferences/activities to inform prospective teachers about issues such as problematic internet usage, managing time control and computer/internet ethics.
  6. Prospective teachers should be guided to plan their daily internet usage length; the frequency and objective in their internet usage, to achieve controlled internet usage the allocation of their activities with respect to certain times. To enable that, the families at home and adviser lecturers at universities should give support to prospective teachers.
  7. Self-competency perceptions of prospective teachers on computer usage are prone to change as well. Internet which requires not further technical knowledge can help prospective teachers feel themselves totally efficient in computer usage. Accordingly before anything else computer usage sufficiency of prospective teachers should be found out by computer lecturers. Within the scope of designated competencies project applications through internet should be submitted to prospective teachers. Hence better controlled internet usage of prospective teachers can be ensured.
  8. Measurements should be taken to prevent transformation of dense computer usage of CET department prospective teachers into excessive/problematic internet usage. For that purpose, prospective teachers studying at this department should be informed to increase their awareness. Furthermore, if necessary, receiving professional support should be supported.
  9. In order to analyze the interaction of problematic internet usage with far different personal and psychological features, qualitative and in-depth researches should be conducted.


REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association (1995). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (4th ed.)  Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, K.J. (2001). Internet Use Among College Students: An Exploratory Study. Journal of American College Health, 50, 21-26.
Black, D., Belsare, G. and Schlosser, S. (1999). Clinical Features, Psychiatric Comorbidity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Persons Reporting Compulsive Computer Use Behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 60, 839-843.
Caplan, S.E. (2005). A Social Skill Account of Problematic Internet Use. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 721-736.
Ceyhan, E., Ceyhan A., Gürcan, A. (2007). Validity and Reliability Studies of Problematic Internet Usage Scale. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(1), 387-416.
Chin-Chung, T., Sunny, L. (2003). Internet Addiction of Adolescents in Taiwan: an Interview Study. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 6, 649-652.
Davis, R.A.(2001). A Cognitive-Behavioral Model For Pathological Internet Use (PIU), Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 187-195.
 Deniz, L. (2001). Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayar Yaşantılarına Yönelik Bir İzleme Çalışması [A Follow-up Study of Computer Experiences of Student School Councelors]. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi [Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Educational Sciences Journal], 13, 87-110.
 Deniz, L., Coşkun, Y. (2004). Öğretmen Adaylarının Internet Kullanımına Yönelik Yaşantıları [Internet Experiences of Student Teachers]. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi [Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Educational Sciences Journal], 20, 39-52.
Deniz, L. (2007). Prospective Class Teachers’ Computer Experiences and Computer Attitudes. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 116-122.
Erikson, E. (1998) Life Cycle Completed: Extended Version. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Goldberg, I. (1999). Internet Addiction Disorder, http:// www.cog.brown.edu/brochure/people/duchonf/humor/internet.addiction.html retrieved on June 20, 2008.
Griffiths, M. (2000a). Internet Addiction: Time to be Taken Seriously?, Addiction Research, 8, 413-418.
Griffiths, M. (2000b). Does Internet and Computer “Addiction” Exist? Some Case Study Evidence. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 3, 211-218.
Kandell, JJ. (1998). Internet Addiction on Campus: The Vulnerability of College Students. Cyber psychology and Behavior, 1,11-17.
Keser Özcan, N., Buzlu, S. (2005). A Helpful Instrument in Detecting Problematic Internet Usage: The Validity and Reliability of “Scale of Cognitive State on Internet” for University Students. Dependency Journal, 6(1), 19-26.
King, S. and Barak, A. (1999). Compulsive Internet Gambling: A New Form of An Old Pathology. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 2, 441-456.
Köroğlu, G., Öztürk et al. (2006). A Psychiatric Extra Diagnosis Discussion due to a Bi-Polar Patient Afflicted with Problematic Internet Usage: Case Presentation. Addiction Journal, 7(3), 150-154.
Kraut, R.,Kiesler, S.,Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V. and Crawford, A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.
Kubey, R.W., Lavin M.J.and Barrows, J.R. (2001). Internet Use and Collegiate Academic Performance Decrements: Early Findings. Journal of Communication, 51, 366-382.
Leon, D., Rotunda, R. (2000). Contrasting Case Studies of Frequent Internet Use: Is It Pathological or Adaptive?, Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 14, 9-17.
Morahan-Martin, J., Schumacher, P. (2000). Incidence and Correlates of Pathological Internet Use among College Students. Computer-Human Behaviour, 16,13-29.
Niemz, K.,Griffiths, M., Banyard, P. (2005). Prevalence Of Pathological Internet Use Among University Students And Correlations With Self-Esteem, The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) And Disinhibition. Cyber Psychology & Behavior,  8(6), 562-570.
Odabaşıoğlu, G., Öztürk et al. (2007). Internet Addiction Clinical Forms via a Ten-Case Serial. Addiction Journal, 8(1), 46-51.
Rotunda, R.J., Kass et al. (2003). Internet Use and Misuse: Preliminary Findings From a New Assessment Instrument. Behavior Modification, 27, 484-504.
Turkish Statistical Institute (2008). A Research on Information Technologies Applications in Enterprises http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?tb_id =60&ust_id=2 retrieved on December  31, 2008.
Wright, C. (2001). Children and Technology: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities. Childhood Education, 78 (1), 37-41.
Young, K.S. (1996a). Psychology of Computer Use: XL. Addictive Use of The Internet: A Case That Breaks The Stereotype, Psychological Reports, 79, 899-902.
Young, K.S. (1996b). Internet Addiction: The Emergence of A New Clinical Disorder. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 1(3), 237-244.
Young, K.S., Rodgers, R. (1998). The Relationship Between Depression and Internet Addiction. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 1(1), 25-28.
Young, K.S. (1999). Internet Addiction: Symptoms, Evaluation And Treatment, http://v2.netaddiction.com/articles/symptoms.pdf  retrieved on June 16, 2008.
Young, K.S. (2006). Surfing Not Studying: Dealing With Internet Addiction On Campus. http://www.netaddiction.com/articles/surfing_not_studying.htm retrieved on December 28, 2008.





* This study is a part of a master thesis titled as “Investigation of Problematic Internet Use by Prospective Teachers”.


Cite:
Tutgun, A. & Deniz, L. (2010). Problematic Internet Usage Among Prospective Teachers, Uluslar arası Eğitim Teknolojileri Kongresi (IETC) 2010, Volume II, Page 1226, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul. 

Hiç yorum yok:

Yorum Gönder